Archive / Issue No. 14

Midterm Election Digest

37 days to Election DayDay score 0

01Race developments

Republicans privately worried about slipping grip on North Carolina and Georgia Senate seats

CNN reporting from inside GOP strategy circles describes real anxiety about Michael Whatley's race against Roy Cooper in North Carolina and Mike Collins's race against Jon Ossoff in Georgia. A GOP super PAC, Old North Action, cut its North Carolina ad reservations by roughly a third. Longtime strategist Karl Rove was blunt: "We're not going to win either one."

"You spend the money where we get Republicans elected." — Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC), on the party's spending trade-offs

Senate Majority Leader John Thune's Atlanta fundraiser for Collins brought in $400,000+, but Sen. John Cornyn pointedly left both Collins and Whatley off the invite list for his own recent fundraiser. Collins's campaign argues roughly 1 in 10 Georgia voters, mostly Trump backers, are still gettable.

Deep South Democrats point to real organizing gains in Alabama, Mississippi and Georgia

An AP wire report finds concrete, if modest, evidence behind Democratic optimism in the Deep South: Alabama's Democratic primary turnout has roughly doubled since 2022, with some counties casting more Democratic than Republican primary votes for the first time in years. Former Sen. Doug Jones is running for governor and Shomari Figures for a U.S. House seat, each having raised about $1.3 million; in Mississippi, Scott Colom is challenging Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith. Georgia's Ossoff and Warnock are cited as the region's clearest "bright spot."

"The numbers are there. It's a question of getting those voters out." — Doug Jones

The piece frames this as organizing progress, not a prediction of Deep South upsets — Alabama and Mississippi remain heavy underdog territory for Democrats.

02Polling & forecasts

Maine Senate: a second, contradictory poll — this one has Jackson ahead

The University of New Hampshire Survey Center's "Pine Tree State Poll" (1,312 likely voters, fielded Sept 17–21, published Sept 25) has Troy Jackson (D) at 51% to Susan Collins (R) at 47% — a statistical tie. That's the mirror image of the NYT/Siena poll already covered here (Collins 49, Jackson 46, published Sept 24, fielded almost the same week). Read together, the two polls say the same thing: Maine is a true toss-up with no clear directional trend, not that either side has actually moved.

No rating movement to report. Cook Political Report's Senate, House and Governor pages are unchanged since their last confirmed moves (Sept 23 for Senate, Sept 25 for House — both already logged in this digest). A search for fresh Sabato Crystal Ball rating changes turned up nothing newer than pieces from June 11, Sept 3 and Sept 17, all already stale. Generic-ballot and probability trackers also haven't moved past what was already reported: Emerson's national poll still shows Democrats +11 (Sept 24), and Silver Bulletin's average is still D+8.1 (Sept 24) with no fresher figure published as of this morning.

03Election administration & security

Supreme Court blocks the GOP-favored Missouri map for a third time

The Court again refused to let Missouri use a new, Trump- and Gov. Mike Kehoe-backed congressional map for 2026, halting a federal appeals court ruling that would have revived it. In an unsigned opinion, the justices wrote that switching maps "in the midst of an ongoing election would usher in electoral chaos." Missouri will vote this November under the same district lines used in 2022 and 2024. The Missouri Supreme Court had already ruled that a citizen referendum must approve the new map before it can take effect, and the U.S. Supreme Court let that stand. At least 16 separate lawsuits have been filed over the map, which had redrawn Kansas City-area Rep. Emanuel Cleaver's (D) district to shift roughly 59% of its voters.

CISA releases a midterm election security plan, but skips the specifics

CISA unveiled its 2026 election security plan: regional directors will serve as dedicated election-security advisers, a new free information-sharing platform for election officials, technical risk assessments, and classified monthly briefings reaching 70+ secure sites nationwide. What it doesn't say: staffing numbers or dedicated funding. The Trump administration's proposed FY2027 budget would eliminate CISA's election-security program entirely, pending Congress. Michigan officials have already reported losing contact with CISA staff after earlier cuts, and reporting indicates the administration doesn't plan to issue additional public or declassified foreign-threat warnings this cycle, a departure from 2024 practice.

No further movement on the SAVE voter-verification database case since the Supreme Court's stay covered in yesterday's issue — litigation continues in lower courts, no final ruling yet.

04Worth sharing

05Seat-change score

Tracks confirmed race-rating movement from named nonpartisan raters only (Cook, Sabato, etc.) — not polls, fundraising, endorsements, or aggregate probability numbers. +1 per race moving toward Democrats, −1 toward Republicans, flat regardless of how many notches.
DateScoreContributing moves
Sept 210None confirmed
Sept 22+12Inside Elections' full dozen-race batch (itemized later via Roll Call): ME-Sen, CO-5, FL-14, FL-16, FL-27, IA-2, NY-19, NC-1, TX-9, WI-1, plus FL-Gov and ME-Gov, all D-ward
Sept 23+2MI-Sen Toss-up→Leans D; OH-Gov Leans R→Toss-up (Sabato)
Sept 24+3GA-Sen, KS-Sen, SC-Sen all shifted D-ward (Cook)
Sept 250None confirmed
Sept 26+15Cook's 15-race House ratings batch, all D-ward; new aggregate 208 D-favored / 205 R-favored / 22 toss-ups
Sept 270None confirmed today. The Missouri map ruling (Section 3) is a court decision, not a rater rating change, so it doesn't score under this methodology.

Trend: two outsized single-day jumps (Sept 22 and Sept 26) account for nearly all of the past week's movement — both were batch updates from Cook and Inside Elections rather than steady day-by-day drift. On the other five days, including today, no nonpartisan rater confirmed a single rating change. Read this as episodic re-ratings clustering around the same underlying story (Trump approval, cost-of-living pressure), not a smooth week-over-week trend.

Only CONFIRMED changes from a named nonpartisan rater count; stories that merely flag a possible-but-unconfirmed shift are excluded until independently itemized.